Skip to content

Conversation

@cbrady
Copy link
Contributor

@cbrady cbrady commented Dec 2, 2025

No description provided.

@cbrady cbrady self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@cbrady cbrady force-pushed the chris/sch-5303-datastream-replicator-in-the-typescript-node-sdk branch from 2ed93f5 to bfc0dad Compare December 2, 2025 17:19
@cbrady cbrady marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2025 00:50
@cbrady cbrady requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2025 00:50
@cbrady cbrady force-pushed the chris/sch-5303-datastream-replicator-in-the-typescript-node-sdk branch from 8a59ba9 to 81b4c3b Compare December 23, 2025 22:24
@cbrady cbrady force-pushed the chris/sch-5303-datastream-replicator-in-the-typescript-node-sdk branch from 81b4c3b to 932cb49 Compare January 22, 2026 17:28
this.keyPrefix = options.keyPrefix || 'schematic:';

// Dynamically import Redis to avoid requiring it if not used
this.initRedisClient(options);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it okay that we don't await this? Are we concerned that, when redis is used, there could be calls made before the redis client is ready?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah this is how the other datastream versions work kind of fire and let it do its thing

Copy link
Contributor

@bpapillon bpapillon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a few more small comments. also, probably we don't want to check in package-lock.json

@cbrady cbrady force-pushed the chris/sch-5303-datastream-replicator-in-the-typescript-node-sdk branch from 10d4f05 to a0828cf Compare January 28, 2026 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants