forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Regular for-next build test #1157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kdave
wants to merge
10,000
commits into
build
Choose a base branch
from
for-next
base: build
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2d4aefb to
c9e380a
Compare
c56343b to
1cab137
Compare
6613f3c to
b30a0ce
Compare
d205ebd to
c0bd9d9
Compare
15022b1 to
c22750c
Compare
28d9855 to
e18d8ce
Compare
If when relocating a block group we find that `remap_bytes` > 0 in its block group item, that means that it has been the destination block group for another that has been remapped. We need to search the remap tree for any remap backrefs within this range, and move the data to a third block group. This is because otherwise btrfs_translate_remap() could end up following an unbounded chain of remaps, which would only get worse over time. We only relocate one block group at a time, so `remap_bytes` will only ever go down while we are doing this. Once we're finished we set the REMAPPED flag on the block group, which will permanently prevent any other data from being moved to within it. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a function do_remap_tree_reloc(), which does the actual work of doing a relocation using the remap tree. In a loop we call do_remap_reloc_trans(), which searches for the first identity remap for the block group. We call btrfs_reserve_extent() to find space elsewhere for it, and read the data into memory and write it to the new location. We then carve out the identity remap and replace it with an actual remap, which points to the new location in which to look. Once the last identity remap has been removed we call last_identity_remap_gone(), which, as with deletions, removes the chunk's stripes and device extents. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_discard_extent() can be called either when an extent is removed or from walking the free-space tree. With a remapped block group these two things are no longer equivalent: the extent's addresses are remapped, while the free-space tree exclusively uses underlying addresses. Add a do_remap parameter to btrfs_discard_extent() and btrfs_map_discard(), saying whether or not the address needs to be run through the remap tree first. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Balancing the METADATA_REMAP chunk, i.e. the chunk in which the remap tree lives, is a special case. We can't use the remap tree itself for this, as then we'd have no way to boostrap it on mount. And we can't use the pre-remap tree code for this as it relies on walking the extent tree, and we're not creating backrefs for METADATA_REMAP chunks. So instead, if a balance would relocate any METADATA_REMAP block groups, mark those block groups as readonly and COW every leaf of the remap tree. There's more sophisticated ways of doing this, such as only COWing nodes within a block group that's to be relocated, but they're fiddly and with lots of edge cases. Plus it's not anticipated that a) the number of METADATA_REMAP chunks is going to be particularly large, or b) that users will want to only relocate some of these chunks - the main use case here is to unbreak RAID conversion and device removal. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Discard normally works by iterating over the free-space entries of a block group. This doesn't work for fully-remapped block groups, as we removed their free-space entries when we started relocation. For sync discard, call btrfs_discard_extent() when we commit the transaction in which the last identity remap was removed. For async discard, add a new function btrfs_trim_fully_remapped_block_group() to be called by the discard worker, which iterates over the block group's range using the normal async discard rules. Once we reach the end, remove the chunk's stripes and device extents to get back its free space. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a function btrfs_populate_fully_remapped_bgs_list() which gets called on mount, which looks for fully remapped block groups (i.e. identity_remap_count == 0) which haven't yet had their chunk stripes and device extents removed. This happens when a filesystem is unmounted while async discard has not yet finished, as otherwise the data range occupied by the chunk stripes would be permanently unusable. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Dan reported a new smatch warning in free-space-cache.c: New smatch warnings: fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1207 write_pinned_extent_entries() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'block_group' (see line 1203) But the check if the block_group pointer is NULL is bogus, because to get to this point block_group::io_ctl has already been dereferenced further up the call-chain when calling __btrfs_write_out_cache() from btrfs_write_out_cache(). Remove the bogus checks for block_group == NULL in __btrfs_write_out_cache() and it's siblings. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202601170636.WsePMV5H-lkp@intel.com/ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a helper to calculate a block group's exclusive end offset, but we only use it in some places. Update every site that open codes the calculation to use the helper. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a helper to calculate an extent map's exclusive end offset, but we only use it in some places. Update every site that open codes the calculation to use the helper. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's no need to pass both the block_group and block_group::io_ctl to __btrfs_write_out_cache(). Remove passing io_ctl to __btrfs_write_out_cache() and dereference it inside __btrfs_write_out_cache(). Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…writepages [BUG] There is an internal report that over 1000 processes are waiting at the io_schedule_timeout() of balance_dirty_pages(), causing a system hang and trigger a kernel coredump. The kernel is v6.4 kernel based, but the root problem still applies to any upstream kernel before v6.18. [CAUSE] From Jan Kara for his wisdom on the dirty page balance behavior first. This cgroup dirty limit was what was actually playing the role here because the cgroup had only a small amount of memory and so the dirty limit for it was something like 16MB. Dirty throttling is responsible for enforcing that nobody can dirty (significantly) more dirty memory than there's dirty limit. Thus when a task is dirtying pages it periodically enters into balance_dirty_pages() and we let it sleep there to slow down the dirtying. When the system is over dirty limit already (either globally or within a cgroup of the running task), we will not let the task exit from balance_dirty_pages() until the number of dirty pages drops below the limit. So in this particular case, as I already mentioned, there was a cgroup with relatively small amount of memory and as a result with dirty limit set at 16MB. A task from that cgroup has dirtied about 28MB worth of pages in btrfs btree inode and these were practically the only dirty pages in that cgroup. So that means the only way to reduce the dirty pages of that cgroup is to writeback the dirty pages of btrfs btree inode, and only after that those processes can exit balance_dirty_pages(). Now back to the btrfs part, btree_writepages() is responsible for writing back dirty btree inode pages. The problem here is, there is a btrfs internal threshold that if the btree inode's dirty bytes are below the 32M threshold, it will not do any writeback. This behavior is to batch as much metadata as possible so we won't write back those tree blocks and then later re-COW them again for another modification. This internal 32MiB is higher than the existing dirty page size (28MiB), meaning no writeback will happen, causing a deadlock between btrfs and cgroup: - Btrfs doesn't want to write back btree inode until more dirty pages - Cgroup/MM doesn't want more dirty pages for btrfs btree inode Thus any process touching that btree inode is put into sleep until the number of dirty pages is reduced. Thanks Jan Kara a lot for the analysis of the root cause. [ENHANCEMENT] Since kernel commit b551028 ("btrfs: set AS_KERNEL_FILE on the btree_inode"), btrfs btree inode pages will only be charged to the root cgroup which should have a much larger limit than btrfs' 32MiB threshold. So it should not affect newer kernels. But for all current LTS kernels, they are all affected by this problem, and backporting the whole AS_KERNEL_FILE may not be a good idea. Even for newer kernels I still think it's a good idea to get rid of the internal threshold at btree_writepages(), since for most cases cgroup/MM has a better view of full system memory usage than btrfs' fixed threshold. For internal callers using btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() since that function is already doing internal threshold check, we don't need to bother them. But for external callers of btree_writepages(), just respect their requests and write back whatever they want, ignoring the internal btrfs threshold to avoid such deadlock on btree inode dirty page balancing. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Problems with current implementation: 1. reclaimable_bytes is signed while chunk_sz is unsigned, causing negative reclaimable_bytes to trigger reclaim unexpectedly 2. The "space must be freed between scans" assumption breaks the two-scan requirement: first scan marks block groups, second scan reclaims them. Without the second scan, no reclamation occurs. Instead, track actual reclaim progress: pause reclaim when block groups will be reclaimed, and resume only when progress is made. This ensures reclaim continues until no further progress can be made. And resume periodic reclaim when there's enough free space. And we take care if reclaim is making any progress now, so it's unnecessary to set periodic_reclaim_ready to false when failed to reclaim a block group. Fixes: 813d4c6 ("btrfs: prevent pathological periodic reclaim loops") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Suggested-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move the filesystem state validation from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work() into btrfs_should_reclaim() to centralize the reclaim eligibility logic. Since it is the only caller of btrfs_should_reclaim(), there's no functional change. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG] After commit aa60fe1 ("btrfs: zlib: refactor S390x HW acceleration buffer preparation"), we no longer release the folio of the page cache of folio returned by btrfs_compress_filemap_get_folio() for S390 hardware acceleration path. [CAUSE] Before that commit, we call kumap_local() and folio_put() after handling each folio. Although the timing is not ideal (it release previous folio at the beginning of the loop, and rely on some extra cleanup out of the loop), it at least handles the folio release correctly. Meanwhile the refactored code is easier to read, it lacks the call to release the filemap folio. [FIX] Add the missing folio_put() for copy_data_into_buffer(). CC: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org # 6.18+ Fixes: aa60fe1 ("btrfs: zlib: refactor S390x HW acceleration buffer preparation") Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently lzo_decompress_bio() is using compressed_bio->compressed_folios[] array to grab each compressed folio. This is making the code much easier to read, as we only need to maintain a single iterator, @cur_in, and can easily grab any random folio using @cur_in >> min_folio_shift as an index. However lzo_decompress_bio() itself is ensured to only advance to the next folio at one time, and compressed_folios[] is just a pointer to each folio of the compressed bio, thus we have no real random access requirement for lzo_decompress_bio(). Replace the compressed_folios[] access by a helper, get_current_folio(), which uses folio_iter and an external folio counter to properly switch the folio when needed. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently zlib_decompress_bio() is using compressed_bio->compressed_folios[] array to grab each compressed folio. However cb->compressed_folios[] is just a pointer to each folio of the compressed bio, meaning we can just replace the compressed_folios[] array by just grabbing the folio inside the compressed bio. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently zstd_decompress_bio() is using compressed_bio->compressed_folios[] array to grab each compressed folio. However cb->compressed_folios[] is just a pointer to each folio of the compressed bio, meaning we can just replace the compressed_folios[] array by just grabbing the folio inside the compressed bio. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's no point in returning anything since determining and setting a size class for a block group is an optimization, not something critical. The only caller of load_block_group_size_class() (the caching thread) does not do anything with the return value anyway, exactly because having a size class is just an optimization and it can always be set later when adding reserved bytes to a block group (btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()). Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of allocating and freeing a path in every iteration of load_block_group_size_class(), through its helper function sample_block_group_extent_item(), allocate the path in the former and pass it to the later. The path is allocated on stack since it's short and we are in a workqueue context so there's not much stack usage. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's no need to pass the block group since we can extract it from the given caching control structure. Same goes for its helper function sample_block_group_extent_item(). Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…ss() It's supposed to be called with the block group locked, in order to read and set its size_class member, so assert it's locked. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BACKGROUND] Inspired by a recent kernel bug report, which is related to direct IO buffer modification during writeback, that leads to contents mismatch of different RAID1 mirrors. [CAUSE AND PROBLEMS] The root cause is exactly the same explained in commit 968f19c ("btrfs: always fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum"), that we can not trust direct IO buffer which can be modified halfway during writeback. Unlike data checksum verification, if this happened on inodes without data checksum but has the data has extra mirrors, it will lead to stealth data mismatch on different mirrors. This will be way harder to detect without data checksum. Furthermore for RAID56, we can even have data without checksum and data with checksum mixed inside the same full stripe. In that case if the direct IO buffer got changed halfway for the nodatasum part, the data with checksum immediately lost its ability to recover, e.g.: " " = Good old data or parity calculated using good old data "X" = Data modified during writeback 0 32K 64K Data 1 | | Has csum Data 2 |XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX | No csum Parity | | In above case, the parity is calculated using data 1 (has csum, from page cache, won't change during writeback), and old data 2 (has no csum, direct IO write). After parity is calculated, but before submission to the storage, direct IO buffer of data 2 is modified, causing the range [0, 32K) of data 2 has a different content. Now all data is submitted to the storage, and the fs got fully synced. Then the device of data 1 is lost, has to be rebuilt from data 2 and parity. But since the data 2 has some modified data, and the parity is calculated using old data, the recovered data is no the same for data 1, causing data checksum mismatch. [FIX] Fix the problem by checking the data allocation profile. If our data allocation profile is either RAID0 or SINGLE, we can allow true zero-copy direct IO and the end user is fully responsible for any race. However this is not going to fix all situations, as it's still possible to race with balance where the fs got a new data profile after the data allocation profile check. But this fix should still greatly reduce the window of the original bug. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99171 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
…t_item() There's no need to pass the maximum between the block group's start offset and BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET (64K) since we can't have any block groups allocated in the first megabyte, as that's reserved space. Furthermore, even if we could, the correct thing to do was to pass the block group's start offset anyway - and that's precisely what we do for block groups that happen to contain superblock mirror (the range for the super block is never marked as free and it's marked as dirty in the fs_info->excluded_extents io tree). So simplify this and get rid of that maximum expression. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In case the root does not exists, which is unexpected, btrfs_extent_root() returns NULL, but we ignore that and so if it happens we can trigger a NULL pointer dereference later. So verify if we found the root and log an error message in case it's missing. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have a single transaction abort that can be caused either by a failure from a call to btrfs_mark_extent_written(), if we are dealing with a write to a prealloc extent, or otherwise from a call to insert_ordered_extent_file_extent(). So when the transaction abort happens we can not know for sure which case failed. Unfold the aborts so that it's clear in case of a failure. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In the inode self tests, there are several problems: - Invalid file extents E.g. hole range [4K, 4K + 4) is completely invalid. Only inlined extent maps can have an unaligned ram_bytes, and even for that case, the generated extent map will use sectorsize as em->len. - Unaligned hole after inlined extent The kernel never does this by itself, the current btrfs_get_extent() will only return a single inlined extent map that covers the first block. - Incorrect numbers in the comment E.g. 12291 no matter if you add or dec 1, is not aligned to 4K. The properly number for 12K is 12288, I don't know why there is even a diff of 3, and this completely doesn't match the extent map we inserted later. - Hard-to-modify sequence in setup_file_extents() If some unfortunate person, just like me, needs to modify setup_file_extents(), good luck not screwing up the file offset. Fix them by: - Remove invalid unaligned extent maps This mostly means remove the [4K, 4K + 4) hole case. The remaining ones are already properly aligned. This slightly changes the on-disk data extent allocation, with that removed, the regular extents at [4K, 8K) and [8K , 12K) can be merged. So also add a 4K gap between those two data extents to prevent em merge. - Remove the implied hole after an inlined extent Just like what the kernel is doing for inlined extents in the real world. - Update the commit using proper numbers with 'K' suffixes Since there is no unaligned range except the first inlined one, we can always use numbers with 'K' suffixes, which is way more easier to read, and will always be aligned to 1024 at least. - Add comments in setup_file_extents() So that we're clear about the file offset for each test file extent. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Currently the extent map self tests have the following points that will cause false alerts for the incoming strict extent map alignment checks: - Incorrect inlined extent map size Which is not following what the kernel is doing for inlined extents, as btrfs_extent_item_to_extent_map() always uses the fs block size as the length, not the ram_bytes. Fix it by using SZ_4K as extent map's length. - Incorrect btrfs_fs_info::sectorsize As we always use PAGE_SIZE, which can be values larger than 4K. Meanwhile all the immediate numbers used are based on 4K fs block size in the test case. Fix it by using fixed SZ_4K fs block size when allocating the dummy btrfs_fs_info. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Currently we do not check the alignment of extent_map structure. The reasons are the inode and extent-map tests use unaligned values for start offsets and lengths. Thankfully those legacy problems are properly addressed by previous patches, now we can finally put the alignment checks into validate_extent_map(). Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Keep this open, the build tests are hosted on github CI.