Skip to content

Conversation

@rdmark
Copy link
Collaborator

@rdmark rdmark commented Jan 29, 2026

replicate the language of the License section of doc/introduction.md to describe the fact that the original author intended the code to be dual licensed with the freedom granted to the user to choose one of the two

include the full text of the GPL v2, taken directly from the original bstrlib code repository

@rdmark rdmark requested a review from msteinert as a code owner January 29, 2026 20:57
@rdmark rdmark linked an issue Jan 29, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2026

File Coverage Lines Branches
All files 68% 73% 63%
bstring/bstraux.c 55% 64% 46%
bstring/bstrlib.c 73% 76% 69%

Minimum allowed coverage is 50%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 5810503

replicate the language of the License section of doc/introduction.md
to describe the fact that the original author intended the code to be
dual licensed with the freedom granted to the user to choose one of the two

include the full text of the GPL v2, taken directly from the original
bstrlib code repository
@rdmark rdmark force-pushed the 116-license-clarification-bsd-3-clause-gpl-20-both-or branch from 1ec1d44 to 5810503 Compare January 29, 2026 21:01
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

License clarification: BSD-3-Clause, GPL-2.0, both, or?

2 participants