build #178
build #178
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gocanto has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @gocanto, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the 'build-deploy' process within the 'infra/makefile/build.mk' file. The primary goal is to enhance the stability and reliability of deployments by introducing a structured sequence for database initialization and service startup. This ensures that the database is fully prepared and migrated before dependent application services are launched, mitigating potential issues related to service availability and data consistency during deployment. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly improves the build-deploy process by introducing a health check to ensure the database is fully ready before running migrations. This is an excellent change that makes the deployment more robust and reliable by preventing potential race conditions. I have added a couple of minor suggestions to replace hardcoded values with existing Makefile variables to further improve maintainability.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
infra/makefile/build.mk (1)
40-43: Critical: Environment variables not properly exported.The environment variable assignments on lines 41-43 are not effective. In Makefiles, each line runs in a separate shell, so these variables won't be available to subsequent commands (lines 44-53). This will cause the database connection to fail.
🔎 Proposed fix
build-deploy: - @DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" \ - DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" \ - DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" - chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/postgres-entrypoint.sh" && \ + @export DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" && \ + export DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" && \ + export DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" && \ + chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/postgres-entrypoint.sh" && \ chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/run-migration.sh"Alternatively, prefix each docker compose command with the variables:
build-deploy: - @DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" \ - DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" \ - DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" - chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/postgres-entrypoint.sh" && \ - chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/run-migration.sh" + @chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/postgres-entrypoint.sh" && \ + chmod +x "$(DB_INFRA_SCRIPTS_PATH)/run-migration.sh" @echo "Starting database service..." - docker compose --env-file ./.env up api-db -d + @DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" \ + DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" \ + DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" \ + docker compose --env-file ./.env up api-db -d @echo "Waiting for database to be healthy..." @timeout 60 sh -c 'until docker inspect --format="{{.State.Health.Status}}" oullin_db 2>/dev/null | grep -q "healthy"; do sleep 2; done' || (echo "Database failed to become healthy" && exit 1) @echo "Running migrations..." - make db:migrate + @DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" \ + DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" \ + DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" \ + make db:migrate @echo "Starting remaining services..." - docker compose --env-file ./.env --profile prod up -d + @DB_SECRET_USERNAME="$(DB_SECRET_USERNAME)" \ + DB_SECRET_PASSWORD="$(DB_SECRET_PASSWORD)" \ + DB_SECRET_DBNAME="$(DB_SECRET_DBNAME)" \ + docker compose --env-file ./.env --profile prod up -d
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
infra/makefile/build.mk
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: test (1.25.5)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
infra/makefile/build.mk (2)
49-49: No action needed. The container naming is correct. Theapi-dbservice is configured in docker-compose.yml withcontainer_name: oullin_db, so the health check on line 49 will successfully find and inspect the correct container.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
45-45: Therun-migration.shscript is actively used. Whenmake db:migrateis called, it runs theapi-db-migrateDocker service (docker-compose.yml lines 409-422), which usesrun-migration.shas its entrypoint (line 421). Thechmod +xensures the script has proper execute permissions before the Docker service is started.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.