Skip to content

Conversation

@NickLarsenNZ
Copy link
Member

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ commented Jan 15, 2026

Description

Part of #1383

  • Add Trino 479
    • Using Java 25
    • Note: trino-storage is still at 477 because there isn't a later release.
    • Fixed the Dockerfile for differences between the Trino product version and the storage connector version.
  • Remove Trino 451 and 476
  • Remove unused java/jdk versions

Definition of Done Checklist

Note

Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant.

Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

  • Changes are OpenShift compatible
  • All added packages (via microdnf or otherwise) have a comment on why they are added
  • Things not downloaded from Red Hat repositories should be mirrored in the Stackable repository and downloaded from there
  • All packages should have (if available) signatures/hashes verified
  • Add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md file
  • Integration tests ran successfully
TIP: Running integration tests with a new product image

The image can be built and uploaded to the kind cluster with the following commands:

boil build <IMAGE> --image-version <RELEASE_VERSION> --strip-architecture --load
kind load docker-image <MANIFEST_URI> --name=<name-of-your-test-cluster>

See the output of boil to retrieve the image manifest URI for <MANIFEST_URI>.

@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ self-assigned this Jan 15, 2026
@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ changed the title Trino 479 chore(trino): Add 479, remove 451 and 476 Jan 15, 2026
@NickLarsenNZ NickLarsenNZ marked this pull request as draft January 15, 2026 23:17
@NickLarsenNZ
Copy link
Member Author

Needs some code changes:

failed to build JVM config: Trino version 479 is not supported. Only specific versions are handled due to version specific JVM configuration generation                                                                         

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants