Skip to content

Conversation

@apupier
Copy link

@apupier apupier commented Jan 20, 2026

Pull Request

Thank you for contributing to swagger-codegen-generators!

Please fill out the following checklist to help us review your PR efficiently.


Description

Note that it is based on #1396 to have tests played

I wasn't able to test from end to end with swagger- codegen-clias I have nto found where the version of this artifact is defined from the swagger-codegen-cli project BUT I was able to test it in a more complex environment with a Camel Quarkus example https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus-examples/tree/main/openapi-contract-first

Fixes: #1370

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • ✨ New feature
  • ♻️ Refactor (non-breaking change)
  • 🧪 Tests
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🧹 Chore (build or tooling)

Checklist

  • I have added/updated tests as needed
  • I have added/updated documentation where applicable
  • The PR title is descriptive
  • The code builds and passes tests locally
  • I have linked related issues (if any)

How to Test

Screenshots / Additional Context

they were deactivated due to misconfiguration
swagger-api@6207166
where it was configured to use Junit4 although it is TestNg tests which
are used

Signed-off-by: Aurélien Pupier <apupier@ibm.com>
Integer.MAX_VALUE

fixes swagger-api#1370

Signed-off-by: Aurélien Pupier <apupier@ibm.com>
@apupier apupier marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2026 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Bean validation doesn't work for numbers larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE

1 participant